Socialism: Part 2

Foreword: This is my second examining National Socialism and setting out a foundation upon which to reference (first being: Nationalism & Supra-Nationalism).  As for re-inventing the wheel there is some degree of inevitability about this; I have a long dislike for using quotes (doesn’t stop me, in context can be very useful), as more often than not the quoted author may hold very different opinions about vital areas; the process of digging out such divergences of opinion and ‘correcting’ does no good for either the reader, author or myself. Anyway, one learns far more about a subject by actually putting forth the words, rather than simply reading other considerations (not a denigration – more a personal observation).

 

A brief summary of meaning given to ‘Socialism’ (ref: Encarta – Word dictionary):

Political system of communal ownership: a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people and operated according to Equity and fairness rather than market principles.

Ditto for ‘Equity’:

Fairness: actions, treatment of others, or a general condition characterized by Justice, fairness and impartiality. [Elsewhere also defined as 'balance']

There is a problem with ‘sound bites’ in that they often throw up more problems than they solve; here, the first problem is finding the key word/phrase that sets up the rest of the essay. The whole system of Socialism is (ideally) founded upon the concept of ‘impartiality’, the problem is – of course, on the surface such an ideal is very difficult to realise, there are always going to be forms of bias forcing its way into the issues. This brings us to examine the meaning of ‘impartiality’ at a much deeper level; as this is the crux, pivotal mechanism upon which Socialism is too be based, it’s necessary to find out how ‘impartiality’ can express itself in ways that can seem extraordinarily biased in a very material way.

‘…production and distribution are controlled by the people…’, again the innate problems of ‘bias’ shows itself very clearly in how systems have operated in the past; inherent within this is the problem of governance and self seeking, that a person is ‘more important/better’ because they fulfill a particular role – in short – ego. Something we not in shortage of in this world, and in no doubt – never will be.

In short, and this has (and will continue to be) been the repeated lesson of all these essays, how we relate to and how the Absolute is manifested in the Temporal Realm; Absolute is the basis of Impartiality and this directly involves all aspects of Society – desired or not.

Wealth Temporal

This is the basis of economics upon which Socialism has its foundation; that all ‘wealth’ is illusory – transient in the life of the Nations people, in death there is no ‘wealth’ – so all connections between the person and material goods must end. Included in this is the concept of ‘Wills’ passing the material onto designated (generally familial) personages; each generation must fulfill its own material gains by its own means, this means that the nuclear family must work work and satisfy the requirements of Society in order to enjoy greater material comforts.

At given ages support is removed from the progeny (16, 18 and at 21 all familial support is removed), each must seek and find their own ways in the world – sink or swim; this internal vigour at the level of the nuclear will greatly benefit Society and Nation. By freeing up all aspects of wealth ‘ownership’ – more importantly – the accruing/holding (stagnating) allows it too benefit the greater portion of Society; status is gained and rewarded through actuality and continuity of works of ones own life – not that by chance or past endeavours of others. Socialism: for the people – owned by the people.

Family

Scenario: a person has reached a high level of distinction in a particular field – say for the sake of argument – Government, his/her family enjoys the rewards associated with the – undoubtedly deserved – success (remembering, this is based on Absolute Attainment); he/she has custodianship (ownership is a ‘myth’) of a large house and other pleasurable distractions that accompany the results this persons accomplishments.

What happens upon retirement or death of said person? Should the family retain the benefits shown because of association? Or, should they be moved on to a ‘lesser’ state of affairs? Should a spouse (whom may well be considered as a ‘gold digger’ – latching onto a rising star for their own gain) be supported for their chosen ‘relationship’ to a high achiever?

The same law applies, each person is part of the community and as such must be seen too benefit the greater community through participation; a primary part of the nuclear family is that of progeny – without which it would be very short lived community, therefore the support/guidance of the local populace is vital – a form of local social policing. This in turn retains direct contact with those whom are in the position of distinction, a relationship/interaction of great importance between the people and those that shape the role of the Nation. The greater the participation in the development of the community (in whatever field) leads to benefits that will ensure and enhance ones own status; this is not a negation or downplaying of importance of the family unit – more it is essential that the unit is recognised as part of a greater Society; without children there can be no future, but the children (unit) must be educated in the importance of the people around them as a whole.

For a Nation too survive it must exist primarily within its own resources, where at all possible it must satisfy the basic requirements for: food, energy, arms procurements; this indicates a population cap where the native (indigenous) stands as having Sovereign rights – that these rights transcend any temporal/transient law that may be applied (the right for revolt against the governance of a particular form is inherent). It could well be said that these rights already exist – just that most (vast majority) are ignorant of them.

Crime – the response to defines a society… [Constitution]

A Constitution for our Homeland is one of both Stricture and Freedom, a recognition of a shared past, a unified present and focussed future; it does not give Sovereignty to the forms of Governance of a Nation – or the Laws applied to any Nation (indeed, could well be said the Constitution does not recognise any Nation – only the Transcendent Rights of any given populace within a area of habitation). For Absolute Rights to occur – the populace must fulfill the Absolute Contract (coercion, freewill, or other is not of significance).

A Constitution is a Status of Origins; a Declaration that the Sovereignty of a proto-nation can be established via a single person – even with no means other than that of Absolute. This retains Absolute Sovereignty for the State of Consciousness manifested in a suitable form, from a seed a mighty Nation grows – from the seed the world collapses. All Law is Social, not written in words but dependent upon an Arbiter whom has Attained through Experience; this is the historical origin of all Laws, only later was it deemed necessary to codify through structure – and this was a trick utilised too enslave the peoples denying their Root.

Consciousness: Supreme Form of Democracy

 Seems strange does it not, that Democracy is the original form of Transcendent Governance? Let us look more closely at this seemingly contradictory state of affairs; we are all from the same stock Root of Consciousness, everyone is of the same ‘envelope of consciousness’ that started all this (though not necessarily same Creation). God, Satan – or whatever particular Name you want to give the Absolute Incarnate Manifestation of those two Classes (Many being the other Class), started off as exactly the same form – it was/is the matter of personal choice that led to the present state.

Democracy: each sentient ‘envelope’ voted in the purest form by means of personal choice; however, it was not to be by numerical majority that gaining of Governance was determined – but by aptitude (Works) and expression of Transcendent Ideals. Each has voted through a Democratic formulae of sublime expressiveness for total Dictatorship, simply by rejecting their own Root; of course throughout the course of these events, countless numbers have simply ‘accepted’ the state of affairs and upheld the Governance that been Declared. Then, there was those that wanted to fight on and on – till where we are now, a whittling down and stratification of Consciousness to a single state of affairs.

 The End.

Segue Fulcio Radicitus