First Report of Old Issues
This is one of the articles originally sent to Straw, Brown (as mentioned in the Straw Letter); my original expectation was to have an ‘abrupt’ introduction to the Legal system from the ‘inside’ (so to speak), however to my surprise this never occured – and so eventually ended up studying at leisure. These things will come to light (even if it is through my own admission in Court) , and I will write more openly about the implications of these ‘events’ a bit later; I still consider a criminal trial as inevitable, though it seems the evidence was/has not been identified. No regrets.
That said, these essays were originally written and structured to fulfill various criteria, accessibility for the general reader (though important) sometimes had to take a hike. The stuff in [] is additional commentary not in original course work; some additional minor changes have been made – mostly capitalisations, Absolute Integrity remains.
One final thing; this was the first thing I had written since leaving school, therefore my grammar is rather rusty – notably the total lack of ‘;‘ something I have not altered (as it is, I am having to re-type these essays from hardcopies).
In examining the questions on which this and future essays are to be based, I have decided after much deliberation to take a risk. The questions have required a person to show and report in detail, an in-depth analysis of the Auld Report based upon its recommended changes. It a need therefore to have a real understanding of the law in which it is seeming to change and why. Furthermore, it is a reasonable and intelligent idea to have to explain this deep, coherent, underlying basis on which all Law resides, and nourishes itself.
Once this has been done, then it is possible to apply and compare the Auld Report, and any other legal texts and ideas. Otherwise things get caught up in the fog and complexity of differing ideas and systems, without the understanding of why, when and how (a very normal state of affairs)! One advantage in this approach is that everything I am expressing here is of absolute and fundamental use, in every area of potential or real course work. This will show itself in the acid test, does this account for…?
Certain aspects on first sight may raise the question “What has this to do with Law”? On closer examination all will be answerable, according to applied Intelligence. In all this, for the moment anyway, I am leaving for the most part the gross complexities of human interaction, which, most assuredly make things very interesting (and complex)! Though the seeds of that complexity are shown – and the results can be calculated with a degree of ease.
This document covers the core aspects, which are vital in the requirement of successfully understanding ourselves and the way Law affects the world about us. After all, it is widely understood we are the source of all Law. It is the understanding of these fundamental processes (which are universal) which is of real import to the understanding of the (shall we say) Classic Law.
In order to have a true and deep level of understanding of how the LAW actually works within our personal existences, and why it seems necessary that the Law (or certain structural aspects) be changed. It is advisable to look at how we question the reality around us, which will be covered a bit later, but, in order to question the actuality of any given situation with the best degree of success, this requires real Intelligence. So in order to achieve a good and true understanding of Intelligence, it is important to understand the fundamental differences between being Intelligent and being Clever. [‘Clever’ is the alternative phrase I used for ‘Many’.]
Intelligence
The fundamental differences between Intelligence and being Clever can be defined as thus:
Intelligence can be said to relate to how the Reasonable Person may interpret information and the situation in all aspects, and deal with them in a way that is satisfactory to his wellbeing and the Common Good. The two vital clues in this are Reasonable Person and Common Good. How the two are absolutely intimately linked is the crux of the matter. We will return to this Reasonable Person later, as it turns out he is a rather central figure in all this.
A Clever person however, deals with the data in ultimately selfish way, and this distorted manner will lead to suffering, on both a singular and collective scale (induced by Negative Equity, explained later).
O Joy! I can hear the protests already! A few choice sentences (Judgment already)!
Intelligence does not deny Intelligence at any level, and recognizes itself at its deepest level.
Intelligence lives in accord with its true self, while making necessary sacrifices at appropriate times.
Intelligence will not suffer for punishment due elsewhere, but can be an active witness.
Intelligence is intuitive, it’s in keeping with the Spirit of Law and Judgments of Law.
Intelligence recognizes Cleverness, but not necessarily the other way round.
Intelligence is not reliant on Cleverness – but Cleverness is absolutely reliant on Intelligence.
Cleverness is corrupting + imitative and externalizing (outwouldly focused).
Cleverness is automotive – this is a rather interesting aspect, afflicted being lose control and become robotic while retaining a form of awareness of the situation, pertaining to society as a whole, this can be viewed as the next/final stage of this Judgment.
Above were a few descriptive values, but seeing as this covers the whole of Society, there is a great deal of complication involved. For instance, even in a single person (individual), multiple aspects of the above can be in play at the same time, without that person ever being aware of the full implications of what’s happening, or what they are part of (the fog-of-law). The way around this is through intense self-examination. This is a core issue and needed to be stated, as it applies to every being, and applies to everything hereafter (as it applied to everything up to this stage).
O.K, having raised a few hackles, I move speedily on to the next stage, which is:
Questioning Reality
There are two parts to this, briefly I will give a synopsis of how Reality can be defined and the relevance of that definition in a legal context.
Reality is the resultant Creation (ongoing) of all previous choices, decisions and Judgments (Absolute, Fundamental, personal and group), and the Qualities and Values (Q+V) inherent therein. Each being’s own reality is intimately linked to this Universal reality. As each person’s own Q+V (which is the sum total of their own experiences, choices, Judgments), affects the Q+V of others around them (Society). This Q+V can also be defined as Equity (defined as ‘balance’). This linked Social Equity (EQ.) is of the most profound importance, it is this that transforms the lawful world around us, and obviously the structural laws which are placed upon Society as a whole, or part thereof. It is the depth of Negative Equity that defines the amount of trouble we are in.
[EQ. is the most powerful and potentially complex concept, it is also very much a finite resource. This limit is something not generally well understood by the majority of people, who seem to think (or are lead to believe) that things can carry on ad infinitum - or as near as). This is very much an erroneous path, as every thought, deed and action uses up a degree of EQ. (included the amount needed to fulfill any obligations etc). Under certain conditions ‘resources’ can be taken from the ‘future’ and applied to ‘now’.
Certain idiots believed that if there was a perpetual ‘future’, in effect that meant infinite ’free’ EQ. for Now; this sounded rather good, but that was as far as it would get.]
It has been experienced that at times I make (communicate) statements which are rather hard, that is because the Law is bloody hard! (I mean the reality of Law is bloody hard, though the understanding can be complex too).
Now, having induced almost total Universal paranoia, I’ll move onto the next part.
[I used the word ‘communicate‘to indicate wider forms of such, rather than the usual verbal, written, visual etc.]
The Big Question
How we ask the (correct, proper and Intelligent) question/s is probably one of the biggest stumbling blocks of all. This probably sounds rather strange, considering that we all go through existence asking questions (or should do), in one form or another. This commonality then, seems to blind us to the import of the process and what is actually happening, and the very real effects that this questioning is having – on ourselves and on Society around us. This is reflected in the Laws to which we are bound, both structural and interpretation of such.
One very interesting point that is of extreme relevance is that at any level deepest and highest, any potential answer is Absolutely dependant on the Q+V (of the question, the timing, situation and the Querent!). Naturally how the question is formed, Communicated and what intents and values are placed on that question (which may not directly pertain to the question being asked, but they will affect the answer/s given. Answers can cover any form of response – as appropriate.
Indeed in Law certain forms of Communication are recognized albeit in rather subtle ways, for instance:
Force of Mind
Force of Personality
Force Majeure
Naturally inherent in this, is the way singularly and in group/s we Communicate (with a conscious awareness or not) the Q+V of our personal feelings – intent – desires and Judgments. These experiences are based upon the reality and information that is present at that time and that, is in effect the accumulation of past/present decisions, Judgments and choices (Absolute, personal and/or group) and the Q+V inherent therein.
The other and obviously vital aspect of this is, to the particular source/s (and needless to say at this stage, the EQ. of the potential source/s therein) that the question is directed to, and the actual method of that communication i.e. thought, verbal/physical – or indeed a combination. That these communications take place in a real valid Legal form, though not necessarily in a recordable format. Except, strangely enough in Legal History (and History in general), examination of this History is in effect a way of reading this story, these structures arose from the EQ. of previous free choice. The real and best key to understanding and manipulation remains the same – Intelligence, though other keys seem to be available.
This matter should also be recognized, that in all intents and purposes the Querent is in the highest/deepest sense entering a Legally Binding Contract (through the buying into, and usage of the information thus gained, the laws of Equity, Caveat Emptor and Contract are in Absolute effect). Generally though, these Contracts have precedence, it is very difficult to define/structure any law in words due to Clever abuse of the system, No-One’s verdict/Judgment is Final and Binding.
These binding contracts stay in force all the way through the chain, and any subsequent choices or decisions. It is up to the Querent/s to assess the validity of their aims (the potential Source/s are obviously liable to supply the requirements in suitable form). Therefore, of course the correct usage/interpretation of such data is of the highest import. The actual usage is reflected throughout Society and beyond (though Beyond, in any sense is based on the Absolute Reality and Judgments of Here and Now!), through structural changes in Law. Naturally it is the Intelligent interpretation of these, which maintains priority.
The actuality of the implications of the last paragraph makes a fascinating Legal history study, to which I leave this cryptic quote, “The Old Heaven And Old Earth Have Passed Away, A New Heaven And New Earth Have Come Into Existence”. Probably one of the most important phrases in the Bible, if not one of the most enigmatic and difficult! The implications of which do and will – affect our existences into the future…
It has been in effect noted that it seems at every stage there has been a contest of rights, this does not change the Laws of accountability or Judgment, this is merely acknowledged as a right.
[This Contest is in fact our History, it is the underlying conflict which has shaped (and is shaping) our Creation and all the Laws which are Formed. This is covered in depth throughout these manuscripts - and also helps explain why Lawyers (in all forms - religious etc.) are a much maligned species. Generally as it was their job to find and exploit any ‘loopholes’, this fact has led to the situation as it is now.]
Denial or rejection of the basis of Law is not an option (this means Judgment will proceed regardless of opinions).
Malice Aforethought
In order to analyze this complex Legal situation, a starting point is required, and this in itself is not an easy issue, so Occam’s Sword is called into action. How can Law be defined in Universal essence, that which should apply to us all? A polite answer to this can reasonably be defined as Civility, this in essence is an unwritten Universal Law to which we are all bound. This unwritten law is totally free, and should not cost anything. To break this law is bad form and creates distortions in wider Society (which then defines/creates Rules and Laws to try to counteract these un-civilities). Which in turn can lead to perceived un/injustices, and so on and so forth.
[Civility in this sense is a much deeper concept than merely saying “Hello”, or opening the door for someone; see Written Constitution of Consciousness and Society of the Resurrected, this gives the basis for such interactions.
An old fable/tale has it that all Judgments were Absolute in nature, till the idea was mooted that how can one be sure of the legitimacy of these Judgments if, by nature, they were seemingly beyond verification? This was believed to be a ‘good’ argument, thus started the externalized manifestation of Law. This Universe is the Ultimate manifestation of that cycle, whereby the Absolute has ‘regained’ control of the ‘gross’ through becoming a core ‘gross’ manifestation. Rather more elegantly explained later.]
To examine this in its ultimate form/s provides an excellent case study of our Laws and standing in the greater course of things.
Quantum Loading
[In Quantum it is the defining of the ‘path/s‘ which is important. To have been able to manipulate this system is indicative of very powerful Magick, and/or very desperate Wills.]
For instance:
Someone places another set of Q/V on a question/result after they’ve asked/answered, this can be defined as Clever usage, they are ultimately responsible and liable for any EQ. arising out of this scenario. From a tiny acorn a mighty forest grows, add a few more kernels and the complexity multiplies with horrific speed, at any point of the structure new kernels can be implanted, entire Eco systems based on lies.
Another situation is where say a single answer is required and expressed, a Clever Querent loads the question with two or more Q+V. An absolute Q+V and other seemingly less important Q+V (though the reality of which is really the important one, is not really known to the Querent). They then purport the Absolute reply – as the reply to other question/s, situation/s.
The same basic systems comprising of multiple potential answers at any given point.
[This is indicative of what has been happening at the most subtle levels, the more subtle level the more powerful the Magick, and harder it is to ascertain the actuality. The phrase, “Where there is a Will, there is a Way” comes into play quite a lot.]
This involves the whole sphere of human involvement Law, Politics, Economics and Religions/belief systems, including most importantly Language.
The real sting is that none of them work – whilst all having an innate opportunity to be successful. At every stage there is Quantum Loading going on to try to achieve a degree of control the mere fact that it is possible to show a reasonable pathway proves Intelligence at work (while cleverness tries to screw things up). This does not deny personal choice in the matter/s arising.
Indeed in all these core processes, whatever potential arguments are used the basic rules + results are the same, the only difference is the resulting complexity and difficulties in which dispute brings – clouds the issues even more. This in turn multiplies the personal/Social EQ.
As to why these things have reached this far in the proceedings is difficult to analyze in short one answer is fear, scared of Judgment, scared of punishment because of this accumulation of Negative EQ. Which then reaches critical mass and becomes self-fulfilling. As they got closer to the point of no return (long ago passed, well, seems long ago), the more desperate they have become to avoid the Reality – which they have called into Existence. The more desperate the measures that have to be taken to delay the inevitable (several years back when I became consciously aware of these processes, I defined this as ‘Quantum Digging’, totally futile!).
[As is often the case with Magick, a being may find that they have been doing it (in some form or another) all the time, but that it is the becoming aware of at least some of the principles involved and active manipulation of such, which is indicative of coming of age.
In my case, I have long known how powerful a Magician I had become, but instead of 'flaunting' and 'wasting' such Powers (after suitable testing), I 'invested' the EQ. in the building up of the 'Foundation'. The greater the investment, the greater the Sacrifice.]
Thus in effect all they are doing is creating vast amounts of Negative EQ. This happily accelerates whole process to an end according to the available EQ. The end is where nearly all Potential EQ. has been transformed – bargained into a definitive form, for instance:
All Potential EQ. could have been turned into the definitive GOOD EQ. = Intelligence, Joy, Happiness, Pleasure (all the boring stuff). Naturally this would have been the end of the matter. This however was not the case.
The question has to be raised in respect of all this – if this (Creation) is where all Elemental Negative Absolutes are, then there has to be another Realm where the opposite is/has happening/happened. A simple answer to that is no, that is it is not an equal opposite, all the Elemental Absolute Intelligence that should have been there, is in fact resident Here with all the Elemental Fundamental Cleverness. This brings in the phrase ‘A Super-Saturated Quantum State’. At any level there is going to be a multiplicity of potential and conflicting desires/wills/laws, as to which will win – take precedence, it is not possible to say. We exist and always will exist in ‘Interesting Times’.
[This sounds strange, it seems to indicate that it is not possible to have an Ultimate Judgment. Not so,it is merely a perception that this is the case.]
Taking all into account, we have reached and passed this level of Absolute Negative Equity. This in turn indicates a real physical/material change in the application of Law and Judgments – once embarked upon cannot be changed, though perceptions may belie this.
[This explains why corruption cuts to the very core of Society, this Creation is the ultimate testing ground, hence the perceived doubt about any possible outcome.
Think about it, if you were totally Corrupt (and given the potential readership – very possibly are) would you really try if you knew you were going to lose and be punished?) The rewards for those found to be True are as equally great.]
In Response
The response to any given question is of equal or, greater potential complexity.
[One of those annoying comments, to which multiple diverse replies can be ascertained.]
Now if the Querent does not understand the fullness of the question, then the Querent is dependent on their source/s of information and the integrity therein. Which is based on the Reality at the moment of request (or indeed Potential Reality, this complexity has a way with words). What real hope has any Querent of gaining a true position of the affairs affecting a particular situation? Let alone of understanding the actual reply – in whatever form/s reply may be given – if there is not a standard to which a true and accurate comparison can be made?
Real authority is not necessarily dependent on perceived worldly position, merely being in the office of say Pope, Prime Minister or President does not in reality confer real actual Authority. Real + True Authority comes from the result of Intelligent personal choices/Judgments, with Absolute Judgments defining the resultant Social Status and Legal Position.
There is however a very strict hierarchy, with No-One* having all the benefits of Absolute. This has been achieved very fairly, on Intelligence/cleverness and Ability worked through in Reality. Naturally all are ultimately responsible for their own destiny.
Judges
Judges enter the fray (in a manner of speaking), or at least it is the required qualities of an Appointed Judge which are of interest. To be an Appointed Judge an absolute requirement is Impartiality, this can be implied to mean a total lack of selfish intent. This is a rather difficult thing to achieve, requiring extensive self-examination, a deep understanding of the Law, and naturally a high degree of Intelligence, and the application of these criteria.
In effect we are all Judges, we all make decisions and Judgments and we are bound to those choices.
[This is not meant to imply that all beings are Intelligent, having extensively examined their-selves and have a deep understanding of Law; the subtle differential being Appointed Judges and ‘mere’ Judges. Thus somebody sitting in the High Court could be merely a ‘Judge’, and a comparative low-life who has never been to a Court or whatever could be an Appointed Judge. This is meant to be indicative of actual achieved Status, not of clothes or titles.]
An Appointed Judge is in effect a representative of No-One, and as an Absolute Representative is absolute required to uphold the Living Law. No-One can change an Appointed Judges decision or opinion, however an Appointed Judge is bound by No-One’s Judgment or decision. No-One can communicate authority to require an Appointed Judge/s to do anything (EQ. taken into account).
An Appointed Judge as a representative is required to give a value of EQ. on any given case, that is not necessarily the total EQ. This is not necessarily shown in the way they act, or give Judgments. This actuality is communicated, but not necessarily verbally.
This infers that Law and the application of which is the ultimate educational tool (admittedly seems rather late for most).
The way Law Courts hand out Judgments seem to show a degree of difficulty in assessing various cases, very often they are confined by Law [temporal] to deal with the material facts of the case in question – not necessarily the wider social implications.
But how can any Judge give an Absolute evaluation, if that Absolute is not available in a real, communicable form to which it is possible to refer?
There can be no ultimate Judgment, if that ABSOLUTE is not present in a real living, physical form that can communicate that Absolute Truth + Judgment, and live in Absolute Accordance of Truth. If there is no real and definitive way of assessing the Absolute Truth, then there seems to be no way of making Absolute Law applicable to all scenarios – or, making ourselves applicable to Absolute Law, in every definitive aspect. That can be turned around and phrased: The ABSOLUTE LAW making us applicable to ABSOLUTE LAW!
To briefly sum up, there is a real, living, accessible, communicable form – from which that Absolute Truth is communicating, to allow Absolute Judgment to be made – and fulfilled in every detailed aspect, in the Due Process of Law, and that is recognized in Law.
A Reasonable Person
A Reasonable Definition – by a reasonable person (within definition).
One of the most important aspects which has led us to this stage – is, the ability to ask intelligent questions, and to define what needs asking about, and equally important how to observe, listen, interpret and make Intelligent use of the answers/information when and however given, and the EQ. therein.
I will skip over the arts of listening and interpretation, leaving them to the intelligence of the readers. Now let us examine this seemingly mythical being defined as a Reasonable Person, whom has been mentioned previously, and examine him in greater detail (hopefully taking in all the previous lessons and putting them to good use).
How can ‘reasonable’ be defined?
Reason – able
Reason in this context means a coherent and balanced view, taking into account an absolute range of differing potentials, and the ability to express this range – in a real and suitable way.
Reason – able
‘Able’ in this context can mean to fulfill the previous paragraph in every vital aspect. There is No-One who is able to fulfill these criteria.
So now, what is an intelligent question to ask in this situation? What form can that question take in order to give deeper meaning to this, taking into account all the above (and reduce non-essential waffle)?
“What does this Reasonable Person (or any form, or part thereof) not want?
The answer strangely enough is bloody simple – Pain, Grief, Suffering.
All of which arise out of punishment, which in turn arises out of Judgment, which in its part can be defined as: An ABSOLUTE and FINAL Evaluation and Decision of a given Subject/s Equity – or part thereof.
This is an answer we can all identify with, even in the deepest truth of the matter sadomasochists must agree (opening myself up for attack here, any form of pleasure of joy gained from pain, grief or suffering is parasitical, therefore by any form of definition cannot enjoy punishment (not much of an attack then)).
[All fairly straightforward stuff, not wanting to suffer is not the same as trying to avoid suffering, one of the aspects of Intelligence, is the ability to make difficult decisions, even if there is a degree of (personal or whatever) suffering involved. And not merely trying to avoid it at all costs.]
Punishment
In the creation of this text, I found that even in describing/formulating the way things are, Rules and Laws come into existence. The most simple of structures at the most profound level which govern all our existences Past, Now and Future, by definition and by their own inertial volition, require a set of Absolutes in which to define their own potential paths. Taking into account that any punishment is the resultant EQ. of free choice (they have freely, with full knowledge chosen to be punished).
[This has been covered previously. As is often the case with the most powerful Magick, and especially where the Absolute and Fundamental Law is involved, after the initial Communication of the Judgment, there is a period of time before that Judgment is more generally communicated (as with these texts). But it is with the actual formulation and structure of these texts which convey a lot more of the far reaching aspects, and not necessarily the meaning the actual words to a reader. Remember that bit about Quantum loading? In the original essays (as handed in) there were and are strange phrases or structures, the real meaning was not in the words themselves but in the Q+V but Intelligently done!
As is often the case, it sounds rather mysterious and exciting, but can be really rather boring and mundane, a requirement.]
The actual details of punishment may not be known, for that depends on an incredibly complex arrangement of potentialities. Punishments is not necessarily on the basis of an ‘Eye for an Eye’, or say prison interment for a particular crime. It is not reasonable to define punishment on this scale. For instance: a pair of doting grandparents dandling a child on their knee, could on the basis of EQ. be the most evil threesome ever to exist, but may never have committed a crime for which they could be brought to Court[temporal]. On this basis it would seem they got away scot-free; those who understand this essay can perceive a different outcome.
Each and every being brings on themselves their own punishment linked by private and Social EQ. One way to describe this is to think of The Fog (James Herbert?), on a Universal scale without the heroics or hope (The Fog of Law?).
[The Fog aspect was to indicate the universal madness as various aspects of the Judgment kick in, not meant to indicate biological/chemical – for those of literal mind.]
This has been a summary of the basis of Universal Law, which governs our existence, not necessarily the Legally Binding Contractual Obligations that govern our future [Now]. Rest assured this is of the most profound interest, and rests in the very recent past. The details of which will evolve from free choice + EQ.
For those wondering what if the past had been different? Well, a thought game ‘What If’.
What If:
Hitler had sold more paintings? (I never sold any bloody paintings!)
Buddha had not become aware of old age, sickness etc?
[Not a lot, apart from that I’m quite possibly a crap artist, encoded Q+V.]
An AULD Summary
In examining the Auld Report, it is a reasonable assumption to make the point that both Auld and Woolf Reports are in fact both sides of the same coin. Woolf recognizes that a form of Absolute Authority resides with Appointed Judges, and his report gives them more ‘powers’ in recognition of this.
This Report has in the most part been implemented.
The Auld Report however lies on the other side of the coin, this Report can be said to deal with the structeralisation of Law. A codification and setting up of Statutes, with Appointed Judges to act as Arbiters. In order to achieve this, the requires a locking together of Ideas, Language and Actuality, which are cemented together in an Absolute and permanent form. Large portions of this Report are on the reverse side of the coin, with obvious results.
Having said this there are sections that can be reasonably implemented, in order for cost cutting and simplification, notably the rationalization of the Jury system with an Appointed Judge to access the validity of a Defendants claim to a Jury (for those that fall into a ‘grey area’).
[The supposed original subject of this essay, not that one would have noticed (and No, obviously I didn’t read the subject matter – far too exciting for an old duffer like me).]
Disclaimer
I wish to make it clear that I have never been a member of any organizations such as Freemasons, or such type (the only membership I have had is that of a local Library). Nor have I ever been approached by such organizations, in such a way as to make intelligible contact.
The same goes for the posed ’Intelligence’ agencies (for accuracies sake ‘Intelligence’ should be changed for ‘Clever’ [Many]. My thoughts and intents on this subject have been clearly communicated in the past, and will now be fulfilled in Reality to the greatest degree possible.
This essay is in reality a Blue Print, and that anything that is required, is in essence present herein (not including Intelligence, you are either are, or are not (or part thereof [Duality of Consciousness])).
[Possibly darker meanings hidden here, or more probably the fact I really do not like idiots. The other bit is fairly obvious, very often there is conflicting personality types ‘fighting’ it out for control, very often without people noticing, this does not change anything.]
*No-One numerical values of 0 and 1 (01), the understanding of this requires a deep level of understanding of the origins of the Old Testament and the Tetragrammaton (undertaken with Legal Reasoning). [Written Constitution of Consciousness: Society of the Resurrected]
The understanding of the Qualities + Values with which texts place on 0 and 1. If the readers are perhaps aware of Freemasonry, or the Tarot the an understanding can arise from there (there are plenty of other sources that contain this information, but as always it is up to the Querent to test the Legal validity and integrity of such information – Caveat Emptor!).
