A Letter of Intent
[This is part of a letter I wrote some time ago, at an early stage of political interest.}
…to a political future, my views were formed long before my interest was piqued by the possibilities of Nationalism. Indeed, if I were only interested in a Political future I could easily have manipulated, shaped, formed what was previously written to a more... publicly acceptable dish. But this would not contain the foundation for lasting.
Anyway, my goals have already been set out and preparations completed, it is pretty much a certainty that these at some level - would pose some form of conflict with political ideals as set out by any Party. In the short term a rather rough ride.
If I may also expand upon your mentioning the topic Treason in your newsletters; in my email 'Monarchical Issues' I (deliberately) omitted one rather vital mechanic within the system. It is - as is often the case, something that is widely known and regularly trotted out come election time by the media; the ability of the reigning Monarch too reject an Elected Government.
And, as is regularly pointed out – the furore that would result if such an option was acted upon; that aside, it is one of the few mechanisms that the Monarch still retains that can drastically change the Political landscape, and transform the future of the country.
Now, it is essential that we return to the underlying principles that were discussed in my previous emails and consider the following scenario:
What if the Spirit was 'communicate' to the reigning Monarch that they were not too 'accept' the 'Peoples' Elected Government?
What would the implications be if the 'Monarch' was to refuse such an instruction?
Before we begin it is important that understand the principal of Equity and how this affects the situation; a person in a position of Authority takes on the 'Equity' of that aspect of Society. In the Absolute sense, this transcends any personal inclinations or wants - at the end they cannot buck the ride.
This relates to the above scenario in the following way; in this situation the 'Monarch' is bound to the Equity of Society and must fulfil the obligations to the fullest extent. Treason in the first case would be that of Society, in the secondary case – personal. This reasoning is given so that the specter of the 'Whore that sits upon the Throne' in Revelations is dismissed from the mind, again it must be emphasized that each person is responsible for their own actions; High Treason is on the personal level – no blame can be attached to anyone else regardless of circumstances.
Therefore, the position of 'Monarch' could be occupied by any person regardless of Class (Darkness/Light/Many) and give an Equitable account.
The Spirit declares that no Government is too be declared; to reject such a call is Treason of the highest order. The implications are as follows:
This fundamental act of High Treason automatically dissolves any and all Laws within the structure of Society in its entirety:
Terrorism laws so recently implemented – no legitimacy
'Race' laws – no legitimacy ['Heretical two' case, no grounds. This does not omit the possibility that both/either/neither are guilty of Treason]
Tax Laws – no legitimacy
Electoral Laws – no legitimacy
Policing Laws – no legitimacy
Nationalism has no legitimate status, all forms of Governance have no foundation of legitimacy
Magna Carta has no foundation of legitimacy
England, Scotland and Wales – no longer exists
ditto for – America, Holland, Israel etc, even putative states can have no claim for legitimacy
Religions, Belief systems – no state of legitimacy
Even the Monarchy at that moment ceased to exist
All the titles and ‘honours’ that they so gratuitously bestowed upon themselves – no legitimacy
This also applies to ‘physical’ objects.
This all makes for an interesting conundrum: how can it be possible to ‘prosecute’ when the apparatus for doing so no longer has Legal foundation?
The answer is as simple as the mechanism that has destroyed that which is to be most despised; all of Society is based upon the Law of High Treason, and this is the very foundation to which we have returned. No more interminable volumes of Statutes, codifications dictating this, that and the other. Instead, we have at the heart a living Law that is upheld by real people that have lived life in accordance with the Law of Treason, and been found Innocent; it is these that shall pronounce Judgment – firstly on whether or not Treason has been committed, and then – if necessary, upon the material (this does not negate the need for Juries).
Inevitably, over time the process will repeat itself on the ‘local’ as well as the National/International/Universal level, indeed, this process has already started; with the principal of ‘White Power’ (14 Words) at the heart of Nationalism. Another cornerstone is that of the concept of Repossession:
The punishment for Treason is that of Repossession; if, in the last email (‘Society of the…) you replace the idea of ‘zombies’ (keeping in mind the Contract too which we are all obligated) with the concept of ‘Repossession’ then you would find an infinitely more flexible concept, with the added bonus that ‘zombies’ are still in the picture (come on: zombies have as much right to exist as anything else, and they are wonderful for distraction).
Repossession not only refers to privileges, Authority, but too more temporal aspects – wealth, property, freedom and not least living.
Over time it is inevitable that further codification will be added – though never to the level we have around us today; this is the result of truly unique circumstances that ‘many’, will for sure – strive to emulate and ‘better’.
The result for a ‘Nationalist’ country is that of supreme freedom for those whom have lived by the transcendent, guided by the ‘invisible’ hand of Iron Law; for outsiders it will seem like hell, the very epitome of what is too be despised. Dictatorial, anarchic, with those in Authority holding ‘random’ executions for no obvious reason – upheld by inaccessible Law mongers. The populace living in fear of the ‘unknown’.
Back to ‘… how can it be possible to ‘prosecute’ when the apparatus for doing so no longer has Legal foundation?’
In a way, the glibbest answer is probably the easiest; the only way to find out – is too enact the final stage. Not entirely true, just as the Law of Treason is of Absolute rigidity does not mean it is not sublimely subtle.
This can be further evidenced in the following way; you and I have Absolute Authority to reside in this ‘country’ as White Nationalists, however, what if one of us decided to up sticks and go to – say, Mongolia? In this situation that person would be governed by the ‘local’ Treason Laws; the law of Treason is infinitely variable, depending on locale, time, innumerable structures and substructures of Equity. However, Treason is still Treason regardless of circumstances.
And, because of ‘our’ location within the structure of Society, if you commit Treason in one aspect of your life, by its very nature – all aspects and decisions made before and after are then Treasonous, till suitable rectification is made. It would be wrong for anyone too assume that having ‘Attained’ too the highest level it would make a person an ‘Automaton of the Absolute’, that is automatically doing what is right without conscious effort. Everyone, regardless of Status is liable to make mistakes, the only difference is that a Few have shown an excellent ability to learn. That, and if one the ‘Few’ does ‘fuck up’, it will hurt (in accordance with the size of ‘fuck up’, greater risk = greater rewards) and they will lose any benefits that may have accrued in that particular ‘escapade’. It is beholden for each and every person to deeply examine all events (no matter how seemingly mundane or insignificant) in their everyday lives, it is here the ‘keys’ are often hidden. Once more it is advisable to reexamine the previous email, where are all the ‘resources’ gone too? Each and every step is going too be a battle, but this time instead of reinvesting the winnings back into Corrupt Society, we get too ‘keep’ them – for the foreseeable future…
To repeat, Codification would be impossible in any real or lasting form, this does not mean it is not desirable for such implementations to occur. Such a ‘weapon’ is of the utmost value and should be ‘encouraged’ as it ensures rigidity and then ‘fracture’ within a culture; our ‘enemy’ can only exist and operate through ‘form’.
In another way this shows the flexibility and freedom of Policies, for example; the BPP policy on Drugs is that of ‘zero’ tolerance (my phrasing for brevity and example), let us assume that this became Law in a Nationalist Government – so far so good, we can safely say that it is not Treasonous. Now, let us say I was taking drugs and got caught, I’m up the before the Judge and ‘He’ examines the case and declares “Not Guilty!”, even though in a thousand other cases Treason was declared, the Law of Treason transcends – but does not ‘contradict’ any given Policies. Understanding and implementation is of prime importance…
We could even ‘reverse’ the situation and say that drugs were completely Legal, Judges of course could still declare a person ‘Treasonous’ even though technically they were within the Law. [My own position on drugs is similarly 'relaxed', I've lived on the streets (homeless) for a several years and observed much, no matter what legislation is put down – it will not change the mindset of people. Far better a full out and out highly structured response than the feeble witted attempts at 'social responsibility', addiction has been around since the beginning and will remain for perpetuity. It is a mistake not too recognize this and utilize it appropriately.]
Returning yet again too… ‘How can it be possible to ‘prosecute’ when the apparatus for doing so no longer has Legal foundation?’.
The answer is exquisitely simple:
Having identified the appropriate Source, the question is, “Has this person/s [insert name] committed Treason?”. [This is the same methodology that I wrote in Google alt.magick forum; to paraphrase (I can’t remember the exact wording), ‘… if you don’t believe me then question the Spirit (Darkness/Light or both) as too what I have written.’
This, it must be stressed does not ‘solve’ the problem, nor is it a game of ‘twenty questions’. What it does do is give an Absolute foundation upon which too act, the path and methodology of any actions is wholly up the querent/s. Having attained to the highest level of responsibility goes with having the greatest degree of freedom, and of course – the scum de la scum of the Corrupt to deal with.
This then, is the importance of ‘questioning’, identifying the ‘Source’ and its structure. The vast majority of the public are so separated from that Source that they can no longer verify the Absolute Truth. The culpability remains their own; there can be no excuse or mitigating circumstances for the committing of Treason.
Martin,
S.F.R
